Posted by: Freya Anderson
September 16, 2011 @ 6:24pm
Hi Graham~
With US law, it's hard for me to see how what you describe would cause any problems through copyright law itself, but it seems like there could be issues with contract law or other areas of law. It seems to me that this is an issue... Read more...
Replies: 1Posted by: GClement
September 16, 2011 @ 3:35pm
Nithi,
Since the other website is probably copyrighted, you need to be sure that your website has not used the original and creative elements contained in the other website, such as images, designs, etc. The basic design of the other... Read more...
Replies: 1Posted by: GClement
September 14, 2011 @ 12:29pm
Hello lowrider2072005
The scenario you are describing suggests that you could be infringing on copyright protection covering the labels, which often contain colorful or artful images, graphics, etc. So you need to evaluate whether the... Read more...
Replies: 2Posted by: GClement
September 14, 2011 @ 12:20pm
Hi Caitem,
Just to clarify, the provisions for using Elmo to project images during storytime rely on § 109 · Limitations on exclusive rights:
Effect of transfer of particular copy or phonorecord, as follows:
(c)... Read more...
Replies: 1Posted by: JanetCroft
September 6, 2011 @ 12:26pm
It's not the best contract in the world, but it does give him the right to submit his work elsewhere. If it were me, I'd prefer to own my own copyright, but this isn't as bad as it could be, since he still has that right.
Replies: 4Posted by: GClement
September 4, 2011 @ 5:49am
I agree with LWilliamson that it is up to you to decide whether or not to comply with the terms of the license that the publisher attached tothe PDF. They apparently did NOT choose to use a Creative Commons license, which *is* legally defensible. It is... Read more...
Replies: 4Posted by: williamsonl
August 24, 2011 @ 9:36am
I don't believe there is a real question of 'rights' here. The translation is not a legal property so doesn't really convey any rights. My layman's opinion would be that the illegal translations would belong to the publisher, but what they could do with... Read more...
Replies: 1Posted by: williamsonl
August 24, 2011 @ 9:21am
It will be almost impossible for you to determine the copyright status of most of these photographs. Or even if they are even legal copies. If it is a legal copy or original, you can display or sell the print that you own. You may not make any additional... Read more...
Replies: 1Posted by: williamsonl
August 24, 2011 @ 9:10am
Depends on what you are using it for and how much you are using. This could possibly fall under fair use and be considered transformative. Do you intend to sell it? That counts against you. And you could be well within your rights and still receive an... Read more...
Replies: 1Posted by: GClement
August 4, 2011 @ 12:03pm
Hello CartoonEtc,
If you created your own original poster designs, you own the copyright in them and may reproduce, distribute, modify them as you see fit. However, what I am not sure about is whether your posters are truly original, or... Read more...
Replies: 2Posted by: JanetCroft
July 25, 2011 @ 1:51pm
We routinely make replacement copies for missing circulating theses using the archival copy as a master. I don't think it's something you would need permission for. However, for theses that fall in the grey area of still being in copyright but written... Read more...
Replies: 1Posted by: JanetCroft
July 25, 2011 @ 1:47pm
I don't think this is really a copyright issue, simply a local policy issue. Consider a book with an accompanying CD -- on our campus, some branches keep them together and circulate them as a unit, while others split them up with one barcode for each part... Read more...
Replies: 1Posted by: williamsonl
July 19, 2011 @ 1:34pm
Microsoft products are covered more by a licensing agreement than any application of copyright law. Here is a link that has more information on non-participating companies http://www.copyrightservice.co.uk/copyright/p08_berne_convention.
Also,... Read more...
Replies: 1Posted by: GClement
July 14, 2011 @ 12:13pm
Hello Elmer,
Assuming that said photographs are copyrighted, there may be a a couple of provisions within copyright law that would allow your first enumerated use without seeking the permission of the copyright holder.
[|n|n|]... Read more...
Replies: 1Posted by: GClement
July 13, 2011 @ 6:13am
Hello,
US copyright law does not have a specific provision for ebooks...if the ebooks in question are copyrighted by someone other than yourself, you need to comply with the provisions of US Code, Title 17 which you can find online at...
Replies: 1Posted by: williamsonl
July 1, 2011 @ 8:14am
Dr. Shila,
Medical ebooks are not treated any differently than any other copyrighted material. There are many resources linked from our homepage on educational exemptions for using copyrighted material. Ebooks fall under the same copyright law as... Read more...
Replies: 3Posted by: GClement
June 30, 2011 @ 12:21pm
There are two exceptions (outside of Fair use) that might fit the circumstances of your situation.
(1) Section 109(c)
If the situation involved just one classroom, it would seem that projecting the book using the SMART... Read more...
Replies: 4Posted by: GClement
June 29, 2011 @ 7:13am
When working in the US, we apply US Copyright law in our activities. As you noted in your post, US Copyright law (Title 17, Section 105) only provides for the public domain status of US federal works (and there are caveats as to what constitutes a US... Read more...
Replies: 2Posted by: GClement
June 28, 2011 @ 10:52am
Lea, It sounds like you are doing some wonderful programming on behalf of your young patrons!
Because you are publicly performing a song and redistributing it over the Internet, your use would be a copyright violation if the song is... Read more...
Replies: 1Posted by: GClement
June 28, 2011 @ 7:30am
To be eligible for copyright protection, a work must have a minimal amount of original creativity. The examples above, in my individual opinion, skate that line, but some may argue they are copyright-worthy. In general, questions in textbooks and... Read more...
Replies: 2Posted by: GClement
June 22, 2011 @ 2:56pm
florida, My understanding from library legal scholars is that no one factor in the four factors nalaysis trumps the others and that no one factor is dispositive. All four factors need to be considered in aggregate.
Replies: 5Posted by: williamsonl
June 16, 2011 @ 12:39pm
Barry,
I personally would consider the copy on physical reserve the same as the electronic. Whichever way you use it, you are still making copies of an item that you feel exceeds fair use limit. A copy is a copy. It does seem to me that putting... Read more...
Replies: 2Posted by: williamsonl
June 16, 2011 @ 12:29pm
I'm not really clear about what you mean by 'copyright letter'. Do you mean a letter that you will send to the copyright holder requesting permission to perform and publish the translation? If so, you might check the publisher's website--most have either... Read more...
Replies: 4Posted by: RuthDukelow
June 14, 2011 @ 11:14am
Libraries who are lending eReaders (with content loaded) are doing so under the license which allowed them to download the content to that particular eReader. There is no reproduction of the content (i.e., borrowers are not downloading the content to... Read more...
Replies: 1Posted by: RuthDukelow
June 14, 2011 @ 11:08am
Your first step is to do some research to find out who currently owns the recordings you wish to reissue. A quick look via Google suggests that Geffen bought out MCA and that Universal Music Enterprises http://www.umeportal.com/ might now be handling MCA... Read more...
Replies: 1